![]()
The very first thing you need to understand is that if you support reducing immigration and stopping illegal immigration you are not in the minority. In fact, according to a 2006 Zogby poll, archived here, you are in the vast majority as noted in the following table.

See the
article for the rest of the poll results.
The MSM haven’t been telling you this stuff.
While
Americans overwhelming believe something should be done about out of control
immigration, legal and illegal, the MSM, our President and most elected
officials almost all take an opposing view.
Why?
In this
section I will propose specific solutions for what needs to do to solve the
problem. Specific things you can do to
facilitate the solution are addressed in the ACTION section.
While there
are many ideas and strongly differing views on “what to do,” we must recognize
that any program that rewards illegal aliens who have broken the laws of the
United States with citizenship is undeserved and unwarranted amnesty,
regardless of “what” it is called.
That said, what are we to do with the 12+ million
illegal aliens currently in the country?
If 12 million is a problem, then 25 million is a much bigger
problem. When a toilet backs up and is
overflowing, the very first thing you do is to shut off the water and then the
mess is cleaned up. This is common
sense that most in the Government seem to be missing. Maybe it is because they backed up the toilet?
In any case, illegal immigration must be treated
in the same way. This requires two
different set of actions: first slowing down and ultimately preventing entry
and second making it harder for existing illegal aliens to live and stay in the
US while simultaneously “encouraging” many to go home as well as deporting
others.
Before that can happen, it first means recognizing
that there is a problem. Unfortunately,
many people, including those in the MSM, business, and Government, regardless
of party affiliation, don’t seem to think there is a problem. As this paper as detailed, there is a dark
side of illegal immigration that is inflicting massive human and economic costs
on America. If you don’t think the
collateral damage being inflicted is worth saving ten cents on a head of
lettuce it is now your responsibility to convince others because doing
something about it will require significant changes in attitudes amongst the
powers that can actually do something about it.
Basically, it comes down to having the will
to enforce the law and solving the problem.
Political correct measures, such as a “guest worker program,” will not
solve the problem nor will they do much to reduce the collateral damage. As Heather MacDonald noted in Illegal
Immigration Myths “the threat of
enforcement must be credible.”
Former US Congresswoman Barbara Jordan from Texas
(1973-1979) and Chair, U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform, gave testimony on February
24, 1995, before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary
Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims.
She stated:
“ To make sense about the national interest in
immigration, it is necessary to make distinctions between those who obey the
law, and those who violate it.
Therefore, we disagree, also,
with those who label our efforts to control illegal immigration as somehow
inherently anti-immigrant. Unlawful immigration
is unacceptable.
We believe that
employer sanctions can work, but only with a reliable system for verifying
authorization to work. Employers want to obey the law, but they are caught now
between a rock and a hard place. The
current system is based on documents.
An employer must either accept those documents, knowing that they might
be forged, and thus live with the vulnerability to employer sanctions for
hiring someone presenting false identification.
We on the
Commission believe strongly that it is in the national interest for immigrants
to become citizens for the right reasons, not the wrong ones. We want immigrants to be motivated to
naturalize in order to vote, to be fully participating members of our polity-to
become Americans. We don't want to
motivate law-abiding aliens to naturalize just so that they can get food
stamps, health care, job training, or their homes tested for lead.
…deportation is
crucial. Credibility in immigration
policy can be summed up in one sentence: those
who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and
those who should not be here will be required to leave. The top priorities for detention and
removal, of course, are criminal aliens.
But for the system to be
credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process.
…Finally, the Commission recommends better border
management. Far more can and should be done to meet the twin goals of border
management: deterring illegal crossings while facilitating legal ones. But we have to recognize both goals.” (emphasis added)
How far have we come from that attitude? And would you believe that Congresswoman
Jordan was a Democrat? Maybe
Congresswoman Jordan, herself an African-American, understood that illegal
immigration hurts poor Americans and the Black minority the most.
As noted in a Heritage Foundation report, Alternatives
to Amnesty: Proposals for Fair and Effective Immigration Reform:
“Immigration reform should be a matter of national
priority. To be successful, reforms
must include a comprehensive package of measures to reduce illegal entry into
the United States as well as to reduce the current population of unlawfully
present persons. The cornerstone of any
such initiative must be a fair and practical program for repatriating foreign
persons who are illegally present in the United States.”
Interestingly, the US once
got very “tough” on illegal immigration.
As noted in Wikipedia,
in 1954:
“…the burgeoning numbers of illegal immigrants prompted President Dwight D.
Eisenhower to appoint his longtime friend, General Joseph Swing, as INS
Commissioner. According to Attorney
General Herbert Brownell Jr., Eisenhower had a sense of urgency about illegal
immigration immediately when he took office.
In a letter to Sen. William Fulbright, Eisenhower quoted a report in The
New York Times that said: "The rise in illegal border-crossing by Mexican
'wetbacks' to a current rate of more than 1,000,000 cases a year has been
accompanied by a curious relaxation in ethical standards extending all the way
from the farmer-exploiters of this contraband labor to the highest levels of
the Federal Government."
Thus Operation
Wetback began
in California and Arizona and coordinated 1,075 Border Patrol agents along with
state and local police agencies to mount an aggressive crackdown, going as far
as police sweeps of Mexican-American neighborhoods and random stops and ID
checks of "Mexican-looking" people.
By the end of July, over 50,000 aliens were caught in the two states. 488,000 people fled the country for fear of
being apprehended. By September 80,000
had been taken into custody in Texas and, all told, the INS estimated that 500,000 to 700,000 illegal aliens had left
Texas voluntarily.
If Ike was concerned then, I
wonder what he would think now?
While new millennium sensibilities and enlightenment
probably excludes such actions today, preventing entry requires more border
security, including a physical barrier to keep out non-citizens who do not
respect the rule of law and sovereignty of the United States and who are
wantonly ignoring our borders. This is
not much different from locking the front door on your house to keep criminals
from simply strolling in and helping themselves to whatever they want. However, in this case many of those criminals
also want to molest and rape the women and children.
Border security must be the highest priority because if a
few million illegal aliens who simply want to work in the USA can gain access
then so can many hundreds of thousand illegal alien criminals who want to prey on US citizens, as well as a few hundred
thousands of illegal alien sexual
predators, and, of course, a few thousand illegal alien terrorists whose motive is to kill as
many Americans as they can. As it is
now, all three are happening.
Regardless, border security is mandatory to keep the previously deported illegal aliens,
often the hard core criminals, drug peddlers, and sexual perverts, from simply
returning when they are caught and actually deported. As referenced earlier in this report in the various examples of
horrific crime and traffic accidents, a large percentage were caused by an
illegal alien who had been previously
deported. Routinely the perpetrator
had been deported multiple times and often many, many times.
As noted in 2,179
Illegal Immigrants Arrested Half Have Criminal
Records; About 800 Have Been Previously
Deported the current
situation is more like a merry-go-round than any viable national border
security. Even illegal aliens who are caught selling false documents and who are
deported, turn back up in the same place a few months later.
While border security and enforcement has had some improvement, as noted in Fact Sheet: ICE Accomplishments in Fiscal Year 2006, there is still a long, long way to go.
We need a proper Border Fence. NOW! Without proper
border security most of whatever else we do will either be futile or very
inefficient, and most likely both.
As noted in a Judicial Watch article, Criminal
Illegals Live Freely in U.S. when the Government finally gets
around to actually doing something to enforce immigration laws it can be quite
successful. The article notes:
“It
took six years after the deadliest terrorist attack in U.S. history for the
government to finally complete the crucial database that has so far only been
used in three states and is vehemently opposed by immigrant rights groups that
claim it will lead to racial profiling.
But statistics, anecdotes of success and local police tell a much
different story.
In
only a few months the database has helped capture 130 illegal immigrants in
Southern California who would have otherwise been released on bond for their
repeat offense as well as 6,700 jail inmates.
A recent example is the case of a previously
deported Mexican man with a violent record who lived freely in Southern
California. He was arrested for trying
to rob a car and when his fingerprints were scanned into the federal database,
police instantly determined his criminal past, which includes convictions for
child molestation and grand theft auto.
The
Los Angeles County Sheriff said that without the new federal database, a
criminal such as this would have been freed on bail as deputies waited for
hours for federal and state officials to do a background check. The same would happen in thousands of other
cases, according to an official
who said “these people would be undetected
and released if we didn’t have this capability.”
As this paper has detailed, when we catch these
people and finally get around to deporting them, even after they have been
incarcerated for a time, most simply return.
We need the fence!
In the meantime, we need to recognize that illegal
aliens do not have the rights and privileges of American citizens. With the current exception of illegal
aliens’ children born in the United States, they are all lawbreakers and many
are taking advantage of services provided to citizens, making them not much
different than common thieves. They are
owed nothing and should not be treated differently than any other criminal that
is taking things that do not belong to them.
The fact that most come to the US illegally for
economic reasons does not change the fact that they violated the sovereignty of
the United States and jumped ahead of all the millions who are following our
immigration laws. Americans play by the
rules. Few of us would tolerate a line
jumper if we are waiting in a queue to buy concert tickets so why should we
allow it for illegal aliens?
In researching and writing this report, I have
read or reviewed a few thousand websites, articles, columns, and position
papers. About 1,200 are referenced in
this report. As one individual, I have
put together some thoughts on solving the problem. While only a few are original, as most were taken from or
influenced by those sources, they are all part of an integrated, cohesive,
realistic and comprehensive offering that addresses all aspects of illegal
immigration.
Some, like serious border security will take a bit
of money and time to implement.
However, even then, the costs are well worth it, given the damage that
is being inflicted. It is actually the
delay in getting serious and started that is even more costly as every day more
Americans are being molested, raped, killed and murdered while tons of drugs keep
pouring across the border.
However, some of my proposed solutions are fairly
simple and low cost to implement and will have an immediate affect on reducing
the massive collateral damage that is only growing larger with each passing
day.
In any case, to discourage illegal aliens from
being in the United States we must adopt policies and procedures that hinder
violation of our borders laws while simultaneously making it more difficult for
illegal aliens to stay.
If we limit the job opportunities we dramatically
reduce the incentives to violate our sovereignty for all the illegal aliens
that are coming to “only doing the work that Americans won’t do.” If many of the existing illegal aliens go
home on their own accord we solve the problem of needing to round them up and
deport them. As noted earlier, a “get
tough” attitude and approach will encourage many of the “non-criminal”
illegal aliens to leave of their own accord.
These two axioms will greatly reduce the
collateral damage that is being inflicted on American citizens and free up law
enforcement resources to track down the illegal alien criminals, gangsters, and
perverts who won’t leave without the heavy hand of the law coming down on them,
catching and deporting them.
In any case, we must be fed up with the current
situation enough to do something about it.
Accordingly:
The most common method of identification, the driver’s
license, is too unreliable to be used nationally as many states do not require
proof of citizenship. To see how secure
your state’s license is see Coalition
for a Secure Driver’s License.
As previously noted in the Traffic Accidents section, illegal aliens
flock to states such as North Carolina with minimal documentation requirements
to get driver’s licenses. It is also worth noting that most of the 9/11
terrorists had driver’s licenses. In
fact, altogether the 19 terrorists of 9/11 were holding 63 state
driver's licenses.
As Lars Larson and others have proved,
anybody can get a Maticular Consular ID Card.
The US Border Patrol
says that the Matricula
Consular Card is Worthless as an ID.
The FBI says that the Matricula
Consular Card is Worthless as an ID.
See the Testimony of
Steve McCraw, Assistant Director of The Office of Intelligence, FBI Before the
House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims on
Consular ID Cards.
Some states, notably the ones providing
“sanctuary,” and the Mexican Government want to make these Matricula Consular
cards, which are non-verifiable as to the identity of the individual, legal
ID. However, they are so lax that Bin
Laden could get one and then use it to get a U.S. drivers license and drive the
streets of America casing the next big hit.

To see if your
bank accepts this bogus identification, as well as ones that don’t, go to US
Banks that accept Illegal Alien IDs and the good/bad banks
list. If your financial institution
is not on the list ask.
Change your bank
if they accept this Mickey Mouse ID.
To correct this problem now, Congress has the power to
disallow use of any foreign ID, except a passport, to be used for any
interstate activities, including banking.
If you don’t think they are controlling banking now, try taking more
than $10,000 in cash through customs. In
any case, a simple change to interstate baking requirements would do it.
These provisions need to be incorporated into the REAL ID
provisions of Public Law P.L. 109-13
which prohibits Federal agencies from accepting State-issued
driver's licenses or identification cards unless such documents are determined
to meet minimum security requirements.
States that reject the REAL ID should lose all
Federal Highway funds. If they don’t
give a damn who is driving on their roads, let them pay all the costs for
building those roads.
Currently our Social Security number is already a de-facto
national ID card but the card is too easy to counterfeit and the number is too
hard to verify. Thus, we need an easily
verifiable, non-counterfeitable SSN card, including picture and biometric data,
and legislation that makes it mandatory for doing work and receiving benefits
in the USA.
In
affect, this is a national ID card but, like it or not, times have changed and
9/11 changed everything. We are no
longer insulated by oceans. Having the
current and mostly worthless ID cards we use now won’t do you a whole lot of
good if you are killed by illegal aliens terrorists when they nuke New York
City or Washington DC, or when ten illegal aliens are using your stolen
identity and your credit is destroyed.
At
this point it is worth noting that the Use of
fake documents by illegal workers on the rise so “the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services office has started a program to help identify illegal workers. Under the Pilot
Employment Verification Program, participating employers put a worker's
reported name and Social Security number onto an Internet site to make sure the
data matches and the number is legitimate.
It's free and voluntary and has been available to employers in all 50
states since December 2004. Still, only
12,000 of the United States' 12 million employers take part, according to
industry officials, and the program has its weaknesses.”
If MasterCard can provide immediate and trusted verification, what is the problem?
We also need to
immediately shut down the counterfeit document rings in the US such as the one
operated by the Castorena-Leija Sanchez
Organization which has revenue estimated to be in the $300 million range,
annually, which is a LOT of false ID papers.
Not being able to get jobs,
drivers’ licenses and bank accounts will cause many illegal aliens to go home.
This means that we need to get really serious about
enforcing immigration violations. As
reported by Heather MacDonald in The
Illegal-Alien Crime Wave:
“Some of the most violent criminals at large today are illegal aliens. Yet in cities where the crime these aliens commit is highest, the police cannot use the most obvious tool to apprehend them: their immigration status. In Los Angeles, for example, dozens of members of a ruthless Salvadoran prison gang have sneaked back into town after having been deported for such crimes as murder, assault with a deadly weapon, and drug trafficking. Police officers know who they are and know that their mere presence in the country is a felony. Yet should a cop arrest an illegal gang-banger for felonious reentry, it is he who will be treated as a criminal, for violating the LAPD’s rule against enforcing immigration law.
The LAPD’s ban on immigration enforcement mirrors bans in immigrant-saturated cities around the country, from New York and Chicago to San Diego, Austin, and Houston. These “sanctuary policies” generally prohibit city employees, including the cops, from reporting immigration violations to federal authorities.
Such laws testify to the sheer political power of immigrant lobbies, a power so irresistible that police officials shrink from even mentioning the illegal-alien crime wave. “We can’t even talk about it,” says a frustrated LAPD captain. “People are afraid of a backlash from Hispanics.” Another LAPD commander in a predominantly Hispanic, gang-infested district sighs: “I would get a firestorm of criticism if I talked about [enforcing the immigration law against illegals].” Neither captain would speak for attribution.
…Meanwhile, millions of illegal aliens work, shop, travel, and commit crimes in plain view, utterly secure in their de facto immunity from the immigration law.”
No more sanctuary will
cause many illegal aliens to go home.
While everybody knows that certain industries routinely hire illegal aliens, remarkably few employers are ever prosecuted. As noted by CNN anchor Lou Dobbs, since 2001, out of five and a half million employers in the U.S., only 318 have been fined for hiring illegal aliens. In 2004, only three employers were fined.
While the problem has already been bad over the last
decade, and growing worse, the Government has done little about it as noted in
the following chart from a Bear Stearns report, The
Underground Labor Force is Rising to the Surface:

A simple step in the right direction that could be done NOW is to change the rules at the SSA regarding duplicate SSNs. Right now, incredibly, fifty people could be using the same SSN and hardly anything is done. Much of the ID fraud and illegal employment could be dramatically reduced if Congress required the SSA to immediately notify both employers and individuals when a duplicate SSN is being used.
If American Express can provide immediate and trusted
verification, what is the problem?
As noted in Illegal
immigrants steal identities to get jobs:
“Of 231 million Wage and Tax Statements (W2s) filed by
employers during tax year 2004, 8 million did not match. (This figure is not exclusive to identity
fraud. It also includes numbers that
did not match for different reasons, such as name changes). Californians owned 29 percent of those
mismatches, the greatest number of any state.
"It is identity fraud," said Beth Givens,
director of Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, a San Diego-based nonprofit
organization that helps consumers with privacy rights issues.”
Again, much of the ID fraud and illegal employment could be dramatically reduced if Congress required the IRS to immediately notify both employers and individuals when a duplicate SSN on a W2 is being used.
Right now, today,
neither the IRS nor the SSA are very cooperative in preventing the fraud as
noted in a April 2006 report, Agencies
won't share immigration evidence, where it was
noted:.
“Two federal agencies are refusing to turn over a mountain of evidence that investigators could use to indict the nation's burgeoning workforce of illegal immigrants and the firms that employ them.
Last week, immigration cops trumpeted the arrests of nearly 1,200 illegal workers in a massive sting on a single company, but they admit that they relied on old-fashioned confidential informants and an unsolicited tip to get their investigation going.
It didn't have to be that hard.
The IRS and the Social Security Administration routinely collect strong evidence of potential workplace crimes, including names and addresses of millions of people who are using bogus Social Security numbers, their wage records and the identities of the bosses who knowingly hire them.
But they keep those facts secret.
"If the government bothered to look, it could find abundant evidence of illegal aliens gaming our system and the unscrupulous employers who are aiding and abetting them," said Rep. J.D. Hayworth, R-Ariz.”
How prevalent is the false documentation and how easy should it be to catch? See the ICE new release where it was reported:
“ICE agents arrest seven managers of nationwide pallet
company and 1,187 of the firm's illegal alien employees in 26 states. Roughly
53 percent of the firm's employees during 2005 had invalid / mismatched Social
Security numbers.
… The affidavit further alleges that
approximately 53.4 percent of the Social Security numbers contained on the IFCO
Systems North America Inc. payroll of roughly 5,800 workers during 2005 were
either invalid, did not match the true name registered with the Social Security
Administration for that number, or belonged to children or deceased
persons. The Social Security
Administration sent at least 13 written notifications to IFCO headquarters
about such discrepancies on its payroll records in 2004 and 2005, the affidavit
alleges.”
But it was too hard for the SSA to pick up the phone and call DHS with “we have identified a problem.”
How much do the two Government agencies know? As reported in The Secret List of
ID Theft Victims, in 2002 the SSA knew about 9 million mismatched
SSNs. While some are from valid
mistakes, name changes, marriages, et cetera the vast majority are as a result
of illegal aliens. As an interesting
aside, this number would also indicate that the illegal alien population is far
higher than most government agencies and immigration friendly sources admit.
As it is now, the IRS
comes after YOU for back taxes owed on the seven jobs you were simultaneously
working at in different cities and not paying any taxes on because you were
also declaring twelve dependents.
Employers also need to be held more accountable for verifying Social Security numbers and immigration status before hiring and be put on notice that hiring illegal aliens is simply not acceptable.
If stiff fines won’t work then some jail time will. We did it with Martha Stewart and Enron executives who violated the law and ripped off shareholders, why not employers who are violating the law, taking advantage of illegal aliens, denying employment at a fair market wage to citizens, and passing the bill for subsidized illegal workers to taxpayers? A rip-off is a rip-off.
Even when one of the largest companies in the United
States, Wal-Mart,
was found to be knowingly hiring illegal alien cleaning crews, and paying
them a lower wage, they did not get fined.
If DHS would arrest a few senior Wal-Mart executives rather than some IFCO
Systems North America Inc supervisors maybe something would actually get
done. Wal-Mart scrapped their “buy
America” policy after Sam Walton died to increase their bottom line profits a
bit, so maybe some jail time will cause them to scrap their “hire illegal alien
workers at an even cheaper rate” policy as well.
Thus employers who are egregiously violating the law need
to be vigorously prosecuted and fined to put the “fear of God” into other
employers who are violating existing laws.
This will also level the playing field for those companies in industries
with a high percentage of illegal alien workers who are trying to play by the
rules.
Most people who can not speak English and who are applying
for a job are most likely illegal aliens.
Legal immigrants in the same situation will have proper documentation. There is nothing in the Constitution that
defines “not speaking English” as a protected status. This is not rocket science.
No jobs will cause most illegal aliens to go home.
While seemingly harsh, it is also unjust to put the burden
on the taxpayers. Let the many illegal
immigrant supporters pick up the tab through private and charitable giving
until the illegal aliens return home.
There is nothing stopping them from sharing their home and dinner table
with illegal aliens. The social
programs designed to help American citizens are now being abused to provide
services to illegal aliens. This is
both drawing them here and enabling them to stay here.
No more welfare will cause many illegal aliens to go home.
It is a requirement for citizenship to be able to read,
speak and understand English. The only
non-English speaking people in the country would be either tourists or legal
immigrants. Both of those welcomed
groups will have proper documentation and when a legal immigrant doesn’t happen
to have their papers they are the only “undocumented immigrants” in the
US. Everybody else is a citizen, tourist
or an illegal alien.
As noted by a Pro-English article, Since when is
speaking English "discrimination?":
“Executive Order 13166 says that any entity which receives federal funds must provide whatever services it offers in any foreign language spoken by anyone likely to receive those services. It says failure to do so is likely to constitute "discrimination on the basis of national origin" as prohibited by Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights law. Signed by President Clinton on August 11, 2000, the order directs all federal agencies to draft plans to "improve access to federally conducted or federally assisted programs for persons who, as a result of national origin, are limited in their English proficiency.
This executive order gives the United States hundreds of all-but-official languages.”
It uses power
that was never delegated by Congress and has been repeatedly denied to the
Executive Branch by the courts. When
Congress wrote the 1964 Civil Rights Law, language was never considered a basis
for determining discrimination. It is
self-evident that a person's national origin, which cannot be changed, is not
the same as the language someone speaks.
President Bush could easily and immediately rescind this
outrageous Executive Order.
If he wanted to.
It is especially egregious to be printing voting
instructions and ballots in anything but English as only citizens are allowed
to vote and reading and understanding English is a requirement for citizenship
and thus voting. The 1965 Voting Act
should be immediately amended, deleting the foreign language provisions.
Making English the official language is mandatory because
illegal alien friendly bureaucrats and activists are now defining requiring the
speaking of English as discrimination as noted in City Commision: Geno’s
“speak English” sign discriminatory.
When the ACLU complains and files suit, the Justice Dept.
should litigate them out of business.
It is far better to set kids back a year than to simply
pass them through not being able to properly speak and read English and
ultimately end up being many years behind, or dropping out altogether.
In place of the grossly ineffective ESL bureaucracies and
special interest groups in the education system, modern language teaching
methods such as those offered by the Rosetta
Stone should be employed. The Rosetta Stone ESL Education
program is remarkably effective, efficient and fast in teaching English to
non-English speaking people. It is also
very cost effective. Additionally, the
Rosetta Stone program provides native English speaking students the opportunity
to quickly learn one or more of 28 foreign languages.
Somebody needs the will to stand up to the NEA and tell
them to concentrate on Reading, Writing and Arithmetic so Johnny can read and
Suzy can add instead of wasting more human and financial resources on their
mostly ineffective ESL programs.
On arrest and impounding, the driver’s license and the
car’s registration and insurance are to be thoroughly investigated. If the license is counterfeit the driver
will be charged with a felony and jailed.
If the car’s papers are fraudulent, the car is to be seized. If the car has a free and clear title it is
to be sold at auction. If the title is
held by a loan company, a fine equivalent to 25% collateral, based on blue book
fair market value, is levied, and, when paid, the car is returned to the lien
holder. If the fine is not paid the car
is sold at auction. Similar penalties
could also be implemented for DWIs committed on Federal highways, regardless of
citizenship.
When illegal aliens start getting their uninsured and
improperly registered cars confiscated, many will go home.
As noted in Identity and Immigration Status of 9/11 Terrorists: “According to the March 28, 2002 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Robert Thibadeau, director
of Carnegie Mellon's Internet Security labratory, says that "the 19
terrorists on Sept. 11 were holding 63 state driver's licenses for identification." Go to the February 2007, New American article, Illegal
Immigrants in a State of Disarray, by Kurt Williamsen to see how sanctuary policies in working Wisconsin’s Department of Motor
Vehicles facilitates this practice.
While the REAL ID provisions of Public Law
109-13 corrects the security disparities
in state issued driver’s licenses, it does not address the lack of registration
and insurance issue.
Since fraudulent out-of-state documentation is often used,
a national database should be established to provide law enforcement with
immediate verification of all three.
Any driver convicted of driving without insurance will be required to
prepay a years worth of insurance and any subsequent cancellation or
non-payment of insurance while the car is still owned by the driver or anybody
else at the same registering address will result in the car being
impounded.
Driving a car on public roads is a privilege that comes
with responsibilities and it is grossly unjust to put the burden of
irresponsible behavior on the law abiding public.
When illegal aliens start getting their uninsured and
improperly registered cars confiscated, many will go home.
While it is highly unlikely the US will actually deport
hardly any of the existing 12+ million illegal aliens, making being in the
country illegally a felony makes it a whole lot easier to deport certain
undesirable illegal aliens as well as newer illegal aliens. It also denies citizenship and all its
inherent privileges to lawbreakers who entered the country illegally. The only thing worse than accommodating
illegal aliens is allowing illegal aliens to vote which is the main privilege
of citizenship.
As it is now, filing a federal tax return is a gateway to
abusing the system. See: Top
10 Reasons to File Individual U.S. Tax Returns if you are an Undocumented
Immigrant.
In any case, the Federalist Blog notes: Alien
Birthright Citizenship: A Fable That Lives Through Ignorance. Also see Our Constitution
and Our Borders, by Neal Ross in News With Views for some historical
and legal perspectives.
The US Visa
Policy should also be changed to prohibit the entry of obviously pregnant
women until the nationality birth provisions of the 14th Amendment
are clarified and enforced.
When illegal aliens can’t get anchor babies, many will go
home.
If Kennedy wants to fraternize with and pander to terrorists let him
go to their country.
250,000 a year for ten years is much more realistic than
the current 1+ million. To do this, the
family-preference provisions of the US visa program must also be immediately
amended to delete the chain migration of extended family members. (See H.R. 6283,
Nuclear Family Priority Act.) We
must also get back to limiting refugees to those in danger of persecution or
death for religious or political beliefs.
Limiting the number of refugees will also require taking a hard look at Diversity
Lottery and the Temporary
Protected Status we are giving to various countries. We want immigrants that are a benefit to
America, not immigrants that simply meet some politically correct guidelines.
In any case, revolutionary and civil wars are not valid
reasons. In 1776 and 1812, when the US
population was about 3 million we incurred over 17,000 killed and wounded (plus
an unknown number of civilian causalities) securing our freedom. In 1860 when our population was only about
32 million, we had 970,227 killed and wounded Americans in our Civil War. We have also lost another 430,000 Americans,
with another 1 million wounded, fighting for freedom for mostly other people’s
countries. Freedom is not free.
Immigration is the driving factory behind the explosive
growth of the population in the United States.
Exactly how many people do we want in the USA at the end of this
century: 400 million, 500 million or a BILLION? At the present growth rate, there will be a billion people in the
United States within the lifetime of a child born today. Is that what we want? Since the population affects so many aspects
of American society from the environment to needing more HOV lanes on the
already crowded freeways, we need to have a national consensus on what the
population and population growth of the United States should be.
While we are at it, we need to reduce the personal
exemptions for children for taxes. The
US is now a populated country and heading into some serious
overpopulation. If a couple wants to
have ten children that is their business but it is unjust for the rest of the
taxpayers to be paying for them.
Starting now and over the next fifteen years, one child exemption should
be removed each year until the maximum number of personal exemptions for
children is three. An exception would
be made for all adopted children and “Brady Bunch” families would get double
the number. The deductions for the
first two should also be increased to help ensure a stabile population.
Additionally, who is getting visas must be greatly
tightened. As noted by Mark Krikorian,
Executive Director, Center for Immigration Studies, in a May 2006 testimony Visa
Overstays: Can We Bar The Terrorists Door? before
the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations:
“But as important as border security is, it is not
sufficient. It has to be supplemented
by a tightly run immigration system inside the country, and there are a lot of
different aspects to that. But this issue of visa overstays is one of the most
important ones.
I don't mean to be pedantic about it, but, strictly
speaking, it is not the visa that is being overstayed, because the State
Department issues the visas. It is the
length of stay that the immigration inspector gives the person that is
overstayed.
Estimates are that something like as much as 40
percent—maybe 30 to 40 percent—of the illegal alien population is made up of
overstays. So we are talking about
maybe 4 million or more people among the illegal aliens are visa
overstays. So this really is an
extraordinarily large part of the general illegal immigration problem.”
As noted by in How Unskilled Immigrants Hurt Our Economy:
“If America is ever to make immigration work for our economy again,
it must reject policies shaped by advocacy groups trying to turn immigration
into the next civil rights cause or by a tiny minority of businesses seeking
cheap labor subsidized by the taxpayers.
Instead, we must look to other developed nations that have focused on
luring workers who have skills that are in demand and who have the best chance
of assimilating. Australia, for
instance, gives preferences to workers grouped into four skilled categories:
managers, professionals, associates of professionals, and skilled
laborers.
Using a straightforward “points calculator” to determine
who gets in, Australia favors immigrants between the ages of 18 and 45 who
speak English, have a post–high school degree or training in a trade, and have
at least six months’ work experience as everything from laboratory technicians
to architects and surveyors to information-technology workers. Such an immigration policy goes far beyond
America’s employment-based immigration categories, like the H1-B visas, which
account for about 10 percent of our legal immigration and essentially serve the
needs of a few Silicon Valley industries.”
At minimum, since it is a Federal
mandate, the Federal Government should be responsible for 100% of the mandated
costs.
Keep in mind, however, that the Federal
Govt. only gets its money from taxing the citizens so unless some dramatic
changes to the EMTALA are made, the costs will continue to climb with taxpayers
still footing the bill. But, until
then, at least your local hospital or emergency room won’t be closing because
of uncompensated federal mandates.
When illegal aliens can not get free medical care, many
will go home.
This would include people holding dual citizenship as you
are either an American or you aren’t.
Additionally, the misguided Federal Campaign Finance Law should be
immediately amended to dramatically raise the individual contributions, require
public notification reporting within 3 business days, and delete or
dramatically lower all soft money to PACs that finance all the misleading and
obnoxious slime ads otherwise known as “issue advocacy advertisements.” Who is kidding who?
As is, too many are
profiteering from their limited “public service” and selling the USA out.
The illegal alien
supporters don’t seem to mind that Americans are being molested, raped, killed,
and murdered as a result of their actions and that the economic burden and
consequences are being passed to the taxpayers, so it is time to hold them
accountable for their decisions.
As noted by Neal Ross in a News With Views commentary, Our Constitution
and Our Borders:
“James Madison, our 4th President, mindful that there would be those who would t